If a teacher wishes to analyze the individual strengths and weaknesses of a student for intervention planning, which type of test would be most beneficial?

Choosing a criterion-referenced test is advantageous for analyzing individual strengths and weaknesses in students because these tests are specifically designed to measure student performance against a fixed set of predetermined standards or criteria. This allows educators to identify precisely which skills the student has mastered and which areas need further development.

These tests provide clear insights into a student's specific knowledge and performance in relation to defined learning goals, which is crucial for effective intervention planning. By understanding how a student performs on individual learning objectives, a teacher can tailor interventions that target the student's unique needs, rather than merely comparing them to a broader group as would be the case with norm-referenced tests.

Additionally, criterion-referenced assessments often yield actionable data that can inform subsequent instruction, making them vital tools for fostering growth and achievement in students. This direct approach is beneficial when the goal is to create targeted interventions that facilitate personalized learning.